Ashley事件から生命倫理を考える（ミラー）

ガイドラインによって自殺幇助にGOサインが出たが、
医師による幇助がないのだから、人々の情報源はGoogleだけということになる。

英国社会が自殺幇助を受け入れられるかどうかを決めるのは
DPPや裁判所や要介護状態の人たちの仕事ではない。

MS協会としては、こうなった以上、
自殺幇助の法制化が必要かどうか
Royal Commission（王立委員会）から政府に答申してもらいたい。

•The victim was under 18 years of age;
•The victim's capacity to reach an informed decision was adversely affected by a recognised mental illness or learning difficulty;
•The victim did not have a clear, settled and informed wish to commit suicide; for example, the victim's history suggests that his or her wish to commit suicide was temporary or subject to change;
•The victim did not indicate unequivocally to the suspect that he or she wished to commit suicide;
•The victim did not ask personally on his or her own initiative for the assistance of the suspect;
•The victim did not have a terminal illness; or a severe and incurable physical disability; or a severe degenerative physical condition from which there was no possibility of recovery;
•The suspect was not wholly motivated by compassion; for example, the suspect was motivated by the prospect that they or a person closely connected to them stood to gain in some way from the death of the victim;
•The suspect persuaded, pressured or maliciously encouraged the victim to commit suicide, or exercised improper influence in the victim's decision to do so; and did not take reasonable steps to ensure that any other person did not do so.

•The victim had a clear, settled and informed wish to commit suicide;
•The victim indicated unequivocally to the suspect that he or she wished to commit suicide;
•The victim asked personally on his or her own initiative for the assistance of the suspect;
•The victim had a terminal illness or a severe and incurable physical disability or a severe degenerative physical condition from which there was no possibility of recovery;
•The suspect was wholly motivated by compassion;
•The suspect was the spouse, partner or a close relative or a close personal friend of the victim, within the context of a long-term and supportive relationship;
•The actions of the suspect, although sufficient to come within the definition of the offence, were of only minor assistance or influence, or the assistance which the suspect provided was as a consequence of their usual lawful employment.